Scouting Summary
Jessica Pegula's current window is too thin or skewed for a stable public style read. Only 13 charted matches sit in this window, so the read is still directional. Use the metric cards as directional hints, not a settled profile.
Public WTA coverage-qualified profile built from charted matches. Start with the summary, then follow one reliable trait into the wider tour.
Scouting Summary
Jessica Pegula's current window is too thin or skewed for a stable public style read. Only 13 charted matches sit in this window, so the read is still directional. Use the metric cards as directional hints, not a settled profile.
The top line stays simple. Expand any card when you want the raw sample, uncertainty, baseline, rank, and nearby names in the leaderboard.
Profile Shape
Read the page like a scout
Deep return rate
34.8%
Higher values usually mean the return is buying time, pinning the server back, and moving the point off easy first-ball offense.
Adjusted value: 34.8%
Raw value: 36.1%
Baseline: 33.4%
Vs baseline: +1.3 pts
Confidence: High confidence
90% interval: 31.8-37.7
Effective sample size: 704.5
Sample: 711 returnable returns · weighted 760
Threshold: 300+ returnable returns
Forehand attack rate
27.0%
Higher values point to a forehand that steps on the point instead of simply recycling crosscourt.
Adjusted value: 27.0%
Raw value: 24.3%
Baseline: 31.6%
Vs baseline: -4.7 pts
Confidence: High confidence
90% interval: 24.8-29.2
Effective sample size: 1108.9
Sample: 1119 charted forehand directions · weighted 1185
Threshold: 500+ charted forehand directions
Serve variety
100 / 100
Higher values usually mean the first-ball read is harder because serve patterns are not concentrated in one lane.
Adjusted value: 100 / 100
Raw value: 99 / 100
Baseline: 99 / 100
Vs baseline: +0.1 pts
Confidence: High confidence
90% interval: 99.3-99.8
Effective sample size: 965.3
Sample: 974 charted serves · weighted 1043
Threshold: 300+ charted serves
Net approach rate
9.4%
Higher values point to a profile that uses the front court as a recurring pressure tool rather than an emergency option.
Adjusted value: 9.4%
Raw value: 10.2%
Baseline: 7.8%
Vs baseline: +1.6 pts
Confidence: High confidence
90% interval: 8.3-10.4
Effective sample size: 1915.5
Sample: 197 net points across 1933 total points · weighted 2071
Threshold: 30+ net points and 600+ total points
Net conversion
69.3%
Higher values point to cleaner front-court execution once the approach or transition decision is made.
Adjusted value: 69.3%
Raw value: 69.5%
Baseline: 68.6%
Vs baseline: +0.7 pts
Confidence: Medium confidence
90% interval: 63.9-74.7
Effective sample size: 195.9
Sample: 197 net points · weighted 206
Threshold: 30+ net points
Break-point resistance
60.8%
Higher values point to a service profile that stays stable when the score tightens.
Adjusted value: 60.8%
Raw value: 63.1%
Baseline: 57.0%
Vs baseline: +3.9 pts
Confidence: Low confidence
90% interval: 52.0-69.6
Effective sample size: 83.3
Sample: 84 break points faced on serve · weighted 89
Threshold: 20+ break points faced on serve
Nearby names
No nearby leaderboard context is available here.
Break-point attack
46.8%
Higher values point to a return profile that leans forward at the moment the service game can swing.
Adjusted value: 46.8%
Raw value: 47.4%
Baseline: 46.8%
Vs baseline: 0.0 pts
Confidence: Low confidence
90% interval: 39.1-54.4
Effective sample size: 115.2
Sample: 116 break points on return · weighted 122
Threshold: 20+ break points on return
Nearby names
No nearby leaderboard context is available here.
Short service points
56.9%
Higher values point to service games that stay short and front-footed. Lower values usually mean a profile that lives in longer points.
Adjusted value: 56.9%
Raw value: 55.3%
Baseline: 58.6%
Vs baseline: -1.7 pts
Confidence: Medium confidence
90% interval: 52.9-61.0
Effective sample size: 399.5
Sample: 400 charted service points · weighted 428
Threshold: 300+ charted service points
Surface cards only show up when the selected season window has at least 10 charted matches on that surface.
Surface
11 charted hard matches. The surface profile leans most clearly into bp resistance (+3.8 pts vs adjusted baseline), while forehand intent is softer (-4.3 pts vs adjusted baseline).
11 charted matches on hard.
Methodology
The methodology page explains thresholds, weighting, uncertainty, reliability grades, and why some players or surfaces disappear when the sample gets too thin.
Private workflow
Tour Radar is the public proof layer. Private work starts when your team brings a live coaching question and sends team footage, tracking exports, or official reports or exports it can share.