Public charted-match style read from Tour Radar. Use this as a style fingerprint, not a full match report.
Surge read
Emma Raducanu profiles as a score-point closer after opponent-strength weighting and sample normalization. Emma Raducanu tends to hold serve better than the adjusted peer baseline at break point (+0.3 pts vs adjusted baseline). The forehand profile is less line-changing than the adjusted baseline (-4.0 pts vs adjusted baseline), so a lot of points may stay on familiar rails.
Top traits
Watchouts
Displayed values are opponent-strength weighted, shrunk toward the tour-window baseline, and then ranked inside the current tour and window. Every card still shows the raw sample underneath.
Return Depth Pressure
Strength-adjusted value
31.1%
#45 of 57
Signal 40 / 100
Raw 30.8%
-1.6 pts vs baseline · baseline 32.7%
3253 returnable returns · weighted 3402
Higher values usually mean the return is buying time, pinning the server back, and moving the point off easy first-ball offense.
Forehand Intent
Strength-adjusted value
27.9%
#50 of 57
Signal 37 / 100
Raw 27.3%
-4.0 pts vs baseline · baseline 31.9%
5059 charted forehand directions · weighted 5284
Higher values point to a forehand that steps on the point instead of simply recycling crosscourt.
Serve Variety
Strength-adjusted value
99 / 100
#35 of 57
Signal 52 / 100
Raw 98 / 100
-1.0 pts vs baseline · baseline 100 / 100
3981 charted serves · weighted 4185
Higher values usually mean the first-ball read is harder because serve patterns are not concentrated in one lane.
Net Pressure
Strength-adjusted value
6.6%
#48 of 57
Signal 36 / 100
Raw 6.5%
-1.9 pts vs baseline · baseline 8.5%
527 net points across 8088 total points · weighted 8486
Higher values point to a profile that uses the front court as a recurring pressure tool rather than an emergency option.
Net Conversion
Strength-adjusted value
63.4%
#48 of 57
Signal 31 / 100
Raw 63.0%
-4.9 pts vs baseline · baseline 68.3%
527 net points · weighted 545
Higher values point to cleaner front-court execution once the approach or transition decision is made.
Break-Point Resistance
Strength-adjusted value
57.4%
#23 of 57
Signal 53 / 100
Raw 57.3%
+0.3 pts vs baseline · baseline 57.1%
438 break points faced on serve · weighted 463
Higher values point to a service profile that stays stable when the score tightens.
Break-Point Attack
Strength-adjusted value
42.4%
#49 of 57
Signal 35 / 100
Raw 42.3%
-3.2 pts vs baseline · baseline 45.6%
463 break points on return · weighted 477
Higher values point to a return profile that leans forward at the moment the service game can swing.
First-Strike Compression
Strength-adjusted value
55.3%
#32 of 57
Signal 47 / 100
Raw 55.0%
-1.5 pts vs baseline · baseline 56.8%
4194 charted service points · weighted 4392
Higher values point to service games that stay short and front-footed. Lower values usually mean a profile that lives in longer points.
Surface cards only appear when the window has at least 10 charted matches on that surface.
Surface
41 charted hard matches. The surface profile leans most clearly into net conversion (-0.3 pts vs adjusted baseline), while forehand intent is softer (-3.5 pts vs adjusted baseline).
41 charted matches on hard.
Surface
10 charted grass matches. The surface profile leans most clearly into bp resistance (+5.2 pts vs adjusted baseline), while net conversion is softer (-11.2 pts vs adjusted baseline).
10 charted matches on grass.
