Public ATP coverage-qualified profile built from charted matches. Start with the summary, then follow one reliable trait into the wider tour.
Scouting Summary
Hubert Hurkacz profiles as a front-court opportunist after opponent-strength weighting, uncertainty checks, and sample normalization. Hubert Hurkacz finishes cleanly once the point moves forward (+4.7 pts vs adjusted baseline). Hubert Hurkacz keeps service points short more often than the adjusted peer baseline (+2.4 pts vs adjusted baseline). Serve targets are more predictable than the stronger adjusted mixing profiles (-3.5 pts vs adjusted baseline).
What stands out
What opponents can target
Similar Profiles
These are the closest style matches in the same tour and season view.
The top line stays simple. Expand any card when you want the raw sample, uncertainty, baseline, rank, and nearby names in the leaderboard.
Profile Shape
Read the page like a scout
Deep return rate
30.1%
Higher values usually mean the return is buying time, pinning the server back, and moving the point off easy first-ball offense.
Adjusted value: 30.1%
Raw value: 30.6%
Baseline: 29.3%
Vs baseline: +0.8 pts
Confidence: High confidence
90% interval: 28.1-32.1
Effective sample size: 1362.5
Sample: 1377 returnable returns · weighted 1464
Threshold: 300+ returnable returns
Forehand attack rate
44.0%
Higher values point to a forehand that steps on the point instead of simply recycling crosscourt.
Adjusted value: 44.0%
Raw value: 44.4%
Baseline: 41.7%
Vs baseline: +2.2 pts
Confidence: High confidence
90% interval: 42.1-45.8
Effective sample size: 1985.8
Sample: 2007 charted forehand directions · weighted 2155
Threshold: 500+ charted forehand directions
Serve variety
93 / 100
Higher values usually mean the first-ball read is harder because serve patterns are not concentrated in one lane.
Adjusted value: 93 / 100
Raw value: 92 / 100
Baseline: 96 / 100
Vs baseline: -3.5 pts
Confidence: High confidence
90% interval: 92.0-93.6
Effective sample size: 1824.2
Sample: 1845 charted serves · weighted 1965
Threshold: 300+ charted serves
Net approach rate
13.0%
Higher values point to a profile that uses the front court as a recurring pressure tool rather than an emergency option.
Adjusted value: 13.0%
Raw value: 13.2%
Baseline: 11.8%
Vs baseline: +1.2 pts
Confidence: High confidence
90% interval: 12.1-13.9
Effective sample size: 3683.2
Sample: 493 net points across 3724 total points · weighted 3966
Threshold: 30+ net points and 600+ total points
Net conversion
73.2%
Higher values point to cleaner front-court execution once the approach or transition decision is made.
Adjusted value: 73.2%
Raw value: 73.8%
Baseline: 68.5%
Vs baseline: +4.7 pts
Confidence: Medium confidence
90% interval: 69.9-76.5
Effective sample size: 487.5
Sample: 493 net points · weighted 526
Threshold: 30+ net points
Break-point resistance
67.0%
Higher values point to a service profile that stays stable when the score tightens.
Adjusted value: 67.0%
Raw value: 68.6%
Baseline: 62.4%
Vs baseline: +4.6 pts
Confidence: Low confidence
90% interval: 59.9-74.2
Effective sample size: 116.8
Sample: 118 break points faced on serve · weighted 125
Threshold: 20+ break points faced on serve
Nearby names
No nearby leaderboard context is available here.
Break-point attack
37.4%
Higher values point to a return profile that leans forward at the moment the service game can swing.
Adjusted value: 37.4%
Raw value: 37.5%
Baseline: 39.2%
Vs baseline: -1.8 pts
Confidence: Low confidence
90% interval: 30.1-44.7
Effective sample size: 118.8
Sample: 120 break points on return · weighted 125
Threshold: 20+ break points on return
Nearby names
No nearby leaderboard context is available here.
Short service points
61.5%
Higher values point to service games that stay short and front-footed. Lower values usually mean a profile that lives in longer points.
Adjusted value: 61.5%
Raw value: 62.0%
Baseline: 59.2%
Vs baseline: +2.4 pts
Confidence: High confidence
90% interval: 60.1-63.0
Effective sample size: 3150.6
Sample: 3190 charted service points · weighted 3375
Threshold: 300+ charted service points
Surface cards only show up when the selected season window has at least 10 charted matches on that surface.
Surface
13 charted hard matches. The surface profile leans most clearly into bp resistance (+3.7 pts vs adjusted baseline), while serve variety is softer (-4.1 pts vs adjusted baseline).
13 charted matches on hard.
Surface
11 charted clay matches. The surface profile leans most clearly into net conversion (+4.1 pts vs adjusted baseline), while serve variety is softer (-1.6 pts vs adjusted baseline).
11 charted matches on clay.
Methodology
The methodology page explains thresholds, weighting, uncertainty, reliability grades, and why some players or surfaces disappear when the sample gets too thin.
Private workflow
Tour Radar is the public proof layer. Private work starts when your team brings a live coaching question and sends team footage, tracking exports, or official reports or exports it can share.
