Scouting Summary
Andrey Rublev's current window is too thin or skewed for a stable public style read. Only 18 charted matches sit in this window, so the read is still directional. Use the metric cards as directional hints, not a settled profile.
Public ATP coverage-qualified profile built from charted matches. Start with the summary, then follow one reliable trait into the wider tour.
Scouting Summary
Andrey Rublev's current window is too thin or skewed for a stable public style read. Only 18 charted matches sit in this window, so the read is still directional. Use the metric cards as directional hints, not a settled profile.
The top line stays simple. Expand any card when you want the raw sample, uncertainty, baseline, rank, and nearby names in the leaderboard.
Profile Shape
Read the page like a scout
Deep return rate
28.7%
Higher values usually mean the return is buying time, pinning the server back, and moving the point off easy first-ball offense.
Adjusted value: 28.7%
Raw value: 28.2%
Baseline: 29.3%
Vs baseline: -0.6 pts
Confidence: High confidence
90% interval: 26.2-31.3
Effective sample size: 857.4
Sample: 864 returnable returns · weighted 922
Threshold: 300+ returnable returns
Forehand attack rate
49.5%
Higher values point to a forehand that steps on the point instead of simply recycling crosscourt.
Adjusted value: 49.5%
Raw value: 53.5%
Baseline: 41.7%
Vs baseline: +7.8 pts
Confidence: High confidence
90% interval: 47.3-51.7
Effective sample size: 1393.8
Sample: 1405 charted forehand directions · weighted 1519
Threshold: 500+ charted forehand directions
Serve variety
91 / 100
Higher values usually mean the first-ball read is harder because serve patterns are not concentrated in one lane.
Adjusted value: 91 / 100
Raw value: 88 / 100
Baseline: 96 / 100
Vs baseline: -5.2 pts
Confidence: High confidence
90% interval: 89.9-92.0
Effective sample size: 1216.0
Sample: 1226 charted serves · weighted 1311
Threshold: 300+ charted serves
Net approach rate
8.7%
Higher values point to a profile that uses the front court as a recurring pressure tool rather than an emergency option.
Adjusted value: 8.7%
Raw value: 7.9%
Baseline: 11.8%
Vs baseline: -3.0 pts
Confidence: High confidence
90% interval: 7.8-9.7
Effective sample size: 2508.7
Sample: 199 net points across 2529 total points · weighted 2698
Threshold: 30+ net points and 600+ total points
Net conversion
67.5%
Higher values point to cleaner front-court execution once the approach or transition decision is made.
Adjusted value: 67.5%
Raw value: 67.3%
Baseline: 68.5%
Vs baseline: -1.0 pts
Confidence: Medium confidence
90% interval: 62.1-73.0
Effective sample size: 197.5
Sample: 199 net points · weighted 212
Threshold: 30+ net points
Break-point resistance
57.5%
Higher values point to a service profile that stays stable when the score tightens.
Adjusted value: 57.5%
Raw value: 56.2%
Baseline: 62.4%
Vs baseline: -5.0 pts
Confidence: Low confidence
90% interval: 48.8-66.1
Effective sample size: 88.4
Sample: 89 break points faced on serve · weighted 96
Threshold: 20+ break points faced on serve
Nearby names
No nearby leaderboard context is available here.
Break-point attack
36.8%
Higher values point to a return profile that leans forward at the moment the service game can swing.
Adjusted value: 36.8%
Raw value: 36.7%
Baseline: 39.2%
Vs baseline: -2.3 pts
Confidence: Low confidence
90% interval: 29.2-44.5
Effective sample size: 108.2
Sample: 109 break points on return · weighted 114
Threshold: 20+ break points on return
Nearby names
No nearby leaderboard context is available here.
Short service points
62.0%
Higher values point to service games that stay short and front-footed. Lower values usually mean a profile that lives in longer points.
Adjusted value: 62.0%
Raw value: 62.8%
Baseline: 59.2%
Vs baseline: +2.8 pts
Confidence: High confidence
90% interval: 60.0-63.9
Effective sample size: 1735.0
Sample: 1741 charted service points · weighted 1850
Threshold: 300+ charted service points
Surface cards only show up when the selected season window has at least 10 charted matches on that surface.
Surface
15 charted hard matches. The surface profile leans most clearly into forehand intent (+8.5 pts vs adjusted baseline), while serve variety is softer (-5.2 pts vs adjusted baseline).
15 charted matches on hard.
Methodology
The methodology page explains thresholds, weighting, uncertainty, reliability grades, and why some players or surfaces disappear when the sample gets too thin.
Private workflow
Tour Radar is the public proof layer. Private work starts when your team brings a live coaching question and sends team footage, tracking exports, or official reports or exports it can share.